sober companion - sober escort - sober coach - sober driver
(sober los angeles - sober new york - sober london)

How do I contact Dr. Sober? Contact Dr. Sober Companion 24/7 dr.sober@gmail.com

Showing posts with label drug abuse. Show all posts
Showing posts with label drug abuse. Show all posts

Thursday, January 28, 2010

parents do not consider prescription drugs bad

There is a problem in America and other countries where medical doctors and pharmaceutical companies have brainwashed the public into thinking that illegal drugs are bad and prescription drugs are good. PARENTS ARE CLUELESS

Could Dr. Sober Companion have saved Brittany Murphy from dieing so young? The answer is YES, But as a parent, armed with skepticism for ANY prescription drugs given to your children, you can also save your children's lives. Stop being so gullible to the medical industry, who are nothing more than glorified drug pushers.

Many times, prescription drugs are just pharmaceutical grade equivalents for speed (cocaine effects), and similar street drugs. Because they are prescribed, they are seemingly harmless and non-addicting. This is farthest from the truth. Dr. Sober Companion would begin by removing all prescription drugs from your children's environment, and finding why they have been taking them. The menace medical doctor who prescribed them must be stopped, from poisoning any more children.

While I don't talk about removing life sustaining drugs, I do talk about ADD drugs, and other seemingly harmless drugs, that even your child's teacher recommended.

Parents who want the best for their children, send them to drug pushing medical doctors. The parents knowingly allow the prescriptions, and even pay for them, trusting the medical doctor who prescribed them wholeheartedly. Have you ever done this for your children?

You have a problem and cannot completely be blamed, because of your trust of your family doctor. Please wake up to the fact that your medical doctors are really to blame, and all the fake medical research and the good looking (playmate quality) pharmaceutical rep, who lobbies the medical doctor to prescribe their meds.

Dr. Sober Companion knows, that you, as a parent are bombarded daily, by advertising on supposedly ad-free satellite radio, television (especially NBC), and magazines and newspapers. In politics, the pharmaceutical companies spend billions on changing healthcare and inclusion of their drugs while excluding cheaper canadian imports.

Dr. Sober Companion truly believes that Brittany Murphy’s husband Simon Monjack does not understand the concept that prescription drugs kill, more than illegal drugs, when he makes the foolish statement: “In all the time I’ve known her, she has never, and I repeat NEVER, done drugs. Not a line of cocaine, not a hit from a joint, nothing. She was anti-drugs. There are no drugs involved. If any were, I would not be on the phone with you,” the agent explains. (he does not refer to any prescription's)

But if no illegal substances were involved in Brittany’s odd actions, then how can the hordes of prescription medication found in the couple’s bathroom be explained?

Brittany’s mother, Sharon Murphy, explains to the Daily Beast that her daughter was diagnosed with a rare heart condition, mitral valve prolapse, and suffered from hypoglycemia, but was only taking Sarafem for menstrual symptoms and Klonepan for anxiety. (what about the other prescription bottles found?)

While Simon and Brittany's mother Sharon are not completely to blame, they were gullable at protecting Brittany from all the prescription drugs that Brittany Murphy consumed. Being on set and protecting a petite and frail actress from mean and obnoxious studio heads and directors was not where Brittany needed the most help.

In the wake of young actress Brittany Murphy’s sudden death, her husband Simon Monjack

I was never, ever drunk there… I was ‘difficult’ because I was the enforcer to protect Brittany. She was far too nice to stand up to directors and producers who wanted her to work to exhaustion.”


Sharon Murphy reveals that Simon loved her daughter as she explains to the Daily Beast, “Simon was her soul mate, the love of her life. They don’t understand that in Hollywood because it was something real.”

Give your children the chance for a long and healthy life. Remove the prescription drugs, spend more time with your children and if you need to, call Dr. Sober Companion

Sunday, July 19, 2009

michael jackson bombshell discovery is a warning to pharmaceutical companies

many drugs are not safe and effective

michael jackson bombshell warning to pharmaceutical companies - you can no longer hide behind federal laws of "safe and effective".

In march 2009, it was discovered that the FDA has changed its position on state tort law, which may mean that pharmaceutical companies can now be sued without being able to hide behind federal law.

While the blame game continues, and nobody except dr. sober companion points finger at pharmaceutical companies, it has been discovered that the pharmaceutical companies can no longer hide behind FDA warning labels, which made them teflon coated until Wyeth v. Levine appeared in the supreme court of the united states.




Michael Jackson, Heath ledger, Anna Nicole Smith and millions of non famous people may now point a dead finger at pharmaceutical companies because we are not talking about street drugs like heroine and cocaine, but instead their pharmaceutical counterparts, which are as easily available as ordering a pizza and commonly available at your nearest pharmacy.

While Levine also went after the doctors for malpractice, it did not stop with them.
3Respondent sued her physician, physician’s assistant, and hospital for malpractice. After the parties settled that suit for an undisclosed sum, respondent’s physician sent her a letter in which he admitted “responsibility” for her injury and expressed his “profoun[d] regre[t]” and “remors[e]” for his actions. 1 Tr. 178–179 (Mar. 8, 2004) (testimonyof Dr. John Matthew); see also App. 102–103 (testimony of physician’sassistant Jessica Fisch) (noting that her “sense of grief” was so “great” that she “would have gladly cut off [her own] arm” and given it torespondent). Thereafter, both the physician and the physician’s assistant agreed to testify on respondent’s behalf in her suit against Wyeth.

The significance of the supreme court ruling is that the blame game can now include pharmaceutical companies and not just the doctors who administered the drugs. I think the only reason people never thought of this before was that pharmaceutical companies were largely untouchables.

Wyeth (a pharmaceutical company), filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that Levine’s failure-to-warn claims were pre-empted by federal law.

Just because a drug is FDA approved, and has a federal law approved warning label, this does not mean the drug won't kill you.

If a drug kills enough people, it is taken off the market, however if it is because of overdose, it is blamed on the person taking it. If a drug causes distinct negative side effects, those are added to the micro sized small print. Is this adequate to save lives? Dr. sober companion says this is not adequate to save lives.

The following is exerted from Wyeth v. Levine

Petitioner Wyeth manufactures the antinausea drug Phenergan. After a clinician injected respondent Levine with Phenergan by the “IV-push” method, whereby a drug is injected directly into a patient’s vein, the drug entered Levine’s artery, she developed gangrene, and doctors amputated her forearm. Levine brought a state-law damages action, alleging, inter alia, that Wyeth had failed to provide an ade-quate warning about the significant risks of administering Phener-gan by the IV-push method. The Vermont jury determined that Le-vine’s injury would not have occurred if Phenergan’s label includedan adequate warning, and it awarded damages for her pain and suf-fering, substantial medical expenses, and loss of her livelihood as aprofessional musician. Declining to overturn the verdict, the trial court rejected Wyeth’s argument that Levine’s failure-to-warn claimswere pre-empted by federal law because Phenergan’s labeling hadbeen approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The Vermont Supreme Court affirmed.

Wyeth’s argument that requiring it to comply with a state-law duty to provide a stronger warning would interfere with Congress’ purpose of entrusting an expert agency with drug labeling decisions is meritless because it relies on an untenable interpretation of con-gressional intent and an overbroad view of an agency’s power to pre-empt state law. The history of the FDCA shows that Congress didnot intend to pre-empt state-law failure-to-warn actions. In advanc-ing the argument that the FDA must be presumed to have estab-lished a specific labeling standard that leaves no room for different state-law judgments, Wyeth relies not on any statement by Congress but on the preamble to a 2006 FDA regulation declaring that state-law failure-to-warn claims threaten the FDA’s statutorily prescribed role.

The warnings on Phenergan’s label had been deemed sufficient by the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) when it approved Wyeth’s new drug application in 1955 and when it later approved changes inthe drug’s labeling. The question we must decide is whether the FDA’s approvals provide Wyeth with a com-plete defense to Levine’s tort claims. We conclude that they do not.

---------------------------

I don't know if you understand the significance of this supreme court ruling, so let me try to explain in more detail.

Wyeth lawyers made it clear the blame game has changed when it argued that recognition of Levine’s state tort action creates an unacceptable “obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress,” Hines v. Davidowitz, 312 U. S. 52, 67 (1941), because it substitutes a lay jury’s decision about drug labeling for the expert judgment of the FDA.

Do you now begin to see the layers of government protection that was afforded the pharmaceutical companies? Do you begin to see lobbying efforts, and the billions of dollars that went into paying off congress for their votes. The government protection afforded them is now unravelling before our eyes.

Indeed, prior to 2007, the FDA lacked the authority toorder manufacturers to revise their labels. See 121 Stat. 924–926. When Congress granted the FDA this authority,it reaffirmed the manufacturer’s obligations and referred specifically to the CBE regulation, which both reflects the manufacturer’s ultimate responsibility for its label and provides a mechanism for adding safety information to the label prior to FDA approval. See id., at 925–926 (stating that a manufacturer retains the responsibility “to main-tain its label in accordance with existing requirements, including subpart B of part 201 and sections 314.70 and
601.12 of title 21, Code of Federal Regulations


We also learn from this case that the pharmaceutical companies try to blame the doctor as noted here: Nevertheless, the jury rejected Wyeth’s argument that the clinician’s conduct was an intervening cause that absolved it of liability. See App.234 (jury verdict), 252–254. In finding Wyeth negligent as well as strictly liable,

federal law and FDA labeling

In order to identify the “purpose of Congress,” it is ap-propriate to briefly review the history of federal regulation of drugs and drug labeling. In 1906, Congress enacted itsfirst significant public health law, the Federal Food andDrugs Act, ch. 3915, 34 Stat. 768. The Act, which prohib-ited the manufacture or interstate shipment of adulter-ated or misbranded drugs, supplemented the protection for consumers already provided by state regulation and common-law liability. In the 1930’s, Congress becameincreasingly concerned about unsafe drugs and fraudulent marketing, and it enacted the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), ch. 675, 52 Stat. 1040, as amended,21 U. S. C. §301 et seq. The Act’s most substantial innova-tion was its provision for premarket approval of new drugs. It required every manufacturer to submit a newdrug application, including reports of investigations and specimens of proposed labeling, to the FDA for review.Until its application became effective, a manufacturer was prohibited from distributing a drug. The FDA could reject an application if it determined that the drug was not safe for use as labeled, though if the agency failed to act, anapplication became effective 60 days after the filing. FDCA, §505(c), 52 Stat. 1052.
In 1962, Congress amended the FDCA and shifted the burden of proof from the FDA to the manufacturer. Before 1962, the agency had to prove harm to keep a drug out of the market, but the amendments required the manufac-turer to demonstrate that its drug was “safe for use under the conditions prescribed, recommended, or suggested in the proposed labeling” before it could distribute the drug. §§102(d), 104(b), 76 Stat. 781, 784. In addition, the amendments required the manufacturer to prove thedrug’s effectiveness by introducing “substantial evidencethat the drug will have the effect it purports or is repre-sented to have under the conditions of use prescribed,recommended, or suggested in the proposed labeling.” §102(d), id., at 781.
As it enlarged the FDA’s powers to “protect the public health” and “assure the safety, effectiveness, and reliabil-ity of drugs,” id., at 780, Congress took care to preserve state law. The 1962 amendments added a saving clause,indicating that a provision of state law would only be invalidated upon a “direct and positive conflict” with theFDCA. §202, id., at 793. Consistent with that provision,state common-law suits “continued unabated despite . . . FDA regulation.” Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc., 552 U. S. ___, ___ (2008) (slip op., at 8) (GINSBURG, J., dissenting); see ibid., n. 11 (collecting state cases). And when Congressenacted an express pre-emption provision for medicaldevices in 1976, see §521, 90 Stat. 574 (codified at 21
U. S. C. §360k(a)), it declined to enact such a provision for prescription drugs.
In 2007, after Levine’s injury and lawsuit, Congressagain amended the FDCA. 121 Stat. 823. For the first time, it granted the FDA statutory authority to require amanufacturer to change its drug label based on safety information that becomes available after a drug’s initial approval. §901(a), id., at 924–926. In doing so, however,Congress did not enact a provision in the Senate bill thatwould have required the FDA to preapprove all changes todrug labels. See S. 1082, 110th Cong., 1st Sess., §208, pp. 107–114 (2007) (as passed) (proposing new §506D).Instead, it adopted a rule of construction to make it clearthat manufacturers remain responsible for updating their labels. See 121 Stat. 925–926.

See De la Cuesta, 458 U. S., at
153. The FDA’s premarket approval of a new drug appli-cation includes the approval of the exact text in the pro-posed label. See 21 U. S. C. §355; 21 CFR §314.105(b) (2008). Generally speaking, a manufacturer may only change a drug label after the FDA approves a supplemen-tal application. There is, however, an FDA regulation that permits a manufacturer to make certain changes to its label before receiving the agency’s approval. Among otherthings, this “changes being effected” (CBE) regulation provides that if a manufacturer is changing a label to “add or strengthen a contraindication, warning, precaution, or adverse reaction” or to “add or strengthen an instructionabout dosage and administration that is intended to in-crease the safe use of the drug product,” it may make thelabeling change upon filing its supplemental application with the FDA; it need not wait for FDA approval. §§314.70(c)(6)(iii)(A), (C).

As the FDA ex-plained in its notice of the final rule, “‘newly acquired information’” is not limited to new data, but also encom-passes “new analyses of previously submitted data.” Id., at 49604. The rule accounts for the fact that risk informa-tion accumulates over time and that the same data maytake on a different meaning in light of subsequent devel-opments: “[I]f the sponsor submits adverse event informa-tion to FDA, and then later conducts a new analysis of data showing risks of a different type or of greater severityor frequency than did reports previously submitted toFDA, the sponsor meets the requirement for ‘newly ac-quired information.’” Id., at 49607; see also id., at 49606.

Wyeth suggests that the FDA, rather than the manufacturer, bears primary re-sponsibility for drug labeling. Yet through many amend-ments to the FDCA and to FDA regulations, it has re-mained a central premise of federal drug regulation that the manufacturer bears responsibility for the content of itslabel at all times. It is charged both with crafting anadequate label and with ensuring that its warnings re-main adequate as long as the drug is on the market.

why can't FDA adopt the same warning labels as required by tobacco industry?



But the trial court and the Vermont SupremeCourt found that the 1988 warning did not differ in any materialrespect from the FDA-approved warning. See ___ Vt. ___, ___, 944
A. 2d 179, 189 (2006) (“Simply stated, the proposed warning was different, but not stronger. It was also no longer or more prominent than the original warning . . .”); App. 248–250. Indeed, the United States concedes that the FDA did not regard the proposed warning as substantively different: “[I]t appears the FDA viewed the change as non-substantive and rejected it for formatting reasons.” Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 25; see also ___ Vt., at ___, 944 A. 2d, at 189.

what does this mean as far as the blame game?

7Although the first version of the bill that became the FDCA would have provided a federal cause of action for damages for injured consum-ers, see H. R. 6110, 73d Cong., 1st Sess., §25 (1933) (as introduced), witnesses testified that such a right of action was unnecessary because common-law claims were already available under state law. See Hearings on S. 1944 before a Subcommittee of the Senate Committee on Commerce, 73d Cong., 2d Sess., 400 (1933) (statement of W. A. Hines); see id., at 403 (statement of J. A. Ladds) (“This act should not attempt to modify or restate the common law with respect to personalinjuries”). 8In 1997, Congress pre-empted certain state requirements concerningover-the-counter medications and cosmetics but expressly preservedproduct liability actions. See 21 U. S. C. §§379r(e), 379s(d) (“Nothing inthis section shall be construed to modify or otherwise affect any action or the liability of any person under the product liability law of anyState”).


additional notes:

during his closing argument, respondent’s attorney told the jury, “Thank God we don’t rely on the FDA to . . . make the safe[ty] decision.You will make the decision. . . . The FDA doesn’t make the decision, you do,” id., at 211–212.2

Alito commented: Federal law, however, does rely on the FDA to make safety determinations like the one it made here.
But turning a common-law tort suitinto a “frontal assault” on the FDA’s regulatory regime for drug labeling upsets the well-settled meaning of the Supremacy Clause and our conflict pre-emption jurisprudence. Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 21.

---------------

more notes:

They try to solve that problem with helpful politicians doing by executive fiat at an agency what they could not do in Congress; for example, by placing a corporate immunity clause in the preamble of an FDA rule that says if a drug is FDA approved, you can't sue. Thus, drug companies ask the courts to imply that preemption exists even though it was not expressly legislated.

Next up is from the Center for Justice and Democracy, a consumer rights group dedicated to preserving the civil justice system. They issued a report today: THE BITTEREST PILL -- How Drug Companies Fail To Protect Women and How Lawsuits Save Their Lives. The report, according to the authors, "tells the story of the hyped marketing to women of a disproportionate number of unsafe drugs and devices resulting in countless deaths and injuries." As you may guess, they aren't too keen on immunity being granted to a company that was negligent, and whose negligence injured people. It's part of that whole personal responsibility thing that conservatives usually talk about, except when it comes to big business.


In piecing together the emails from the FOIAs, AAJ uncovered the cozy relationship between federal officials and the industries they regulate. For example, the pharmaceutical industry intensified its efforts to influence the FDA in the months leading up to the physician labeling rule's release on January 24, 2006. Much of the lobbying efforts were aimed at Sheldon Bradshaw, who had succeeded Daniel Troy as FDA chief counsel in April 2005.

AAJ obtained emails that list attendees of a meeting between Bradshaw and the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) revealing the FDA chief counsel met with legal representatives from Pfizer, Wyeth, Eli Lilly, Berlex, Organon, Abbott Laboratories, Takeda, Sanofi-Aventis, Serono, AstraZeneca, Cephalon, Millenium, Eisai, Amgen, Astellas, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol Myers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, Merck, and 3M.

Less than six months after this meeting, the agency would release its final physician labeling rule with complete immunity preemption language in the preamble, a complete about-face from the language in the proposed rule that specifically said the agency did not intend to preempt state law with the rule.

"Big business lobbyists have been on a crusade to destroy state consumer protection laws, and further stack the deck against American consumers," said Weisbrod.

Friday, June 26, 2009

will damage control hide what drugs were in michael jackson system

Strategic communications (damage control) expert Michael Levine was once hired by michael jackson, no doubt for damage control. Who will cover up the drug use now that michael jackson died of over prescribed pharmaceutical medications? Besides demerol, what else was michael jackson addicted to?

Will the parents go after the doctor? What licensed doctors will lose their medical license over michael jackson's death?

In a recent poem by Alex Balk, he wrote:

“Who killed Michael Jackson?”
“I,” said the Doctor,
“From my needle he got that last Demerol shot.
I killed Michael Jackson.”

The truth of the matter is, you don't need to be michael jackson to die of over prescribed medications. You don't need to be michael jackson or a celebrity to be addicted to drugs.

Friday, March 20, 2009

young sports agent at CAA dies of drug use or was it just a suicide?

The following obituary of a young man may have occured long ago, but the reality of drug and alcohol addiction is just as big a problem today as it was back then. Depression caused by the economy may even be a bigger concern as young people cannot find jobs and turn to drugs and alcohol to escape their lives problems.

Finding someone to watch over your friends and family like dr. sober companion, can be the difference between life and death. Don't you want to keep your son or daughter alive, long enough to have reached the young age 36?

Jay Moloney, the former CAA "Young Turk" whose meteoric rise as an agent was followed by an equally terrifying free fall into drug addiction, died Tuesday morning in an apparent suicide, authorities said. He turned 35 on Sunday.

Word of Moloney's death swept rapidly through the industry drawing an emotional response from industry friends and former colleagues. CAA president notified CAA staff via a heartfelt e-mail.

Moloney was found hanged in a shower in his Hollywood Hills home about 8 a.m., the Los Angeles County Coroner's Office said. A male friend who was staying in the house called 911 when he heard the shower running for some time.

Moloney was last seen alive sometime between 12:30-1:30 a.m., when he apparently locked himself inside the master bedroom, said L.A. County Coroner's spokesman Scott Carrier. He added that, while the investigation was ongoing, it appeared there was no foul play and no suicide note.

The coroner's office said Moloney had a "history of despondency."

Moloney's death follows years of battling substance abuse. Earlier this year, he was trying once again to re-establish himself in Hollywood after several years of exile. In April, he was named president of Paradise Music & Entertainment, the company newly formed by Bob Dylan's son Jesse, but lost his post there after several months.

"I knew Jay as a decent, hard-working guy," said Ron Meyer, who was president of Universal Studios and a co-founder of CAA. "It's a tragic waste of what could have been a full, productive life."

"He was always trying to get better. So many people worked to try and help Jay," said Andrew Jarecki, CEO of Moviefone and a longtime friend. "If there is any solace, it's that every one of his friends (was) there for him and tried hard to help him. This is a disease that was more powerful than all of his powerful friends."

During his 35 years, Moloney saw some extraordinary highs and lows, even by Hollywood standards.

Raised in Malibu and Newport, Ore., Moloney was the son of screenwriter Jim Moloney. While attending USC film school in May 1984, he landed a job in the CAA mailroom. Almost immediately, the 19-year-old was afforded a grand opportunity -- to work as Michael Ovitz's assistant.

"I am shocked and saddened by Jay's death," Ovitz said in a statement. "He was an incredibly talented man with a kind and gentle soul. Unfortunately, his personal struggles were too great to overcome. I will cherish our friendship, and his memory will remain with me always."

Moloney remained in Ovitz's office for three years before becoming a full-fledged agent. With Ovitz's help, he started handling the careers of some of the biggest names in the business. Among his clients (or clients he represented with Ovitz) were such A-list talent as Martin Scorsese, Ron Bass, Sean Connery, Leonardo DiCaprio, Steven Spielberg, Bill Murray, Dustin Hoffman, David Letterman, Tim Burton and Uma Thurman.

"Jay was the reason that I signed with CAA," said screenwriter Bass, who knew him since 1989. "Before I even signed, he said, 'I'm going to be your agent,' and he went out and he flew across the country and got me a job working for Robert Redford. He did all this without any guarantee of a commission. He was one of the most lovely, charming, unforgettable people that I've seen in the 30-some years I've been in the business. I loved him. I guess (this is) a day I kidded myself would never come."

When Ovitz exited CAA to join the Walt Disney Co. in 1995, Moloney became one of the young agents named to run the agency, joining eight other managing partners including Richard Lovett, Rick Nicita, Lee Gabler, Bryan Lourd, Kevin Huvane, David O'Connor, Tom Ross and Jack Rapke.

About the same time, Moloney's close friends began to learn that he was battling a serious drug problem, and in May 1996 -- unable to kick his addiction -- he resigned from CAA. Subsequently, he spoke about spending time in rehab with reporter John Brodie for a Premiere magazine profile that was published in July 1997.

After leaving CAA, Moloney's life was a succession of battles to beat his drug habit and return to work. During that time, he was reported to have spent time working on a kibbutz in Israel and as a manual laborer in the Caribbean. But he also made at least one suicide attempt at the Beverly Hills Hotel, according to friends.

Throughout his struggles, many of his former CAA partners, along with Ovitz, remained supportive. About a year ago, there was talk that Moloney would join Ovitz's new venture, Artists Management Group. But nothing materialized from those talks.

In April, Moloney was named to run Paradise. But by August, he had stopped coming to work and was reportedly back in rehab, with M. Jay Walkingshaw named to replace him.

"Jay was our brother," the CAA partners said in a statement. "No words can express our sadness and grief at this moment. Everyone who knew Jay loved him."

"He had this youthful energy and exuberance and at the same time was incredibly fearless," said Amy Baer, Moloney's onetime assistant who is now an executive vp with Columbia Pictures. "I learned from him (that) if there was something you wanted to accomplish, proceed with no fear. He was a great teacher without ever really teaching -- he did it by example."

The coroner's office is continuing its investigation and will conduct complete toxicology tests, the results of which will not be available for six to eight weeks.

James David "Jay" Moloney is survived by his mother, Carole Johnson, and his two brothers, Sean and Darren. Funeral arrangements have yet to be determined.

Monday, March 16, 2009

cocaine use by young successful musicians

Cocaine use by young succesful musicians is a very bad lesson and a very good lesson of what awaits success and money. The bad lesson of drug use is that people like robin thicke talk about drug use, sing about drug use and addiction and support drug use. The good lesson of these young wealthy people talking about drug use and addiction is that they are admitting their addictions.



I saw a review of what robin thicke said and agree with wetmoney omega eben gregory, that drug use and addiction is not cool, and that robin thicke is a fool. A rich fool.

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Why do drug addicts think they make good sober companions sober coaches sober escorts?


Why do so many drug addicts and alcoholics think they make great sober companions?
Why do so many drug addicts and alcoholics think they make great sober coach?
Why do so many drug addicts and alcoholics think they make great sober escorts?
Why do so many drug addicts and alcoholics think they make great sober drivers?
Why do so many drug addicts and alcoholics think they make great personal recovery assistant and whatever else these people are calling themselves?

But a bigger question is: Why are you choosing them?

Another drug addict and alcoholic went into the business and is calling his brand sober soldiers.

The following is a so called experts from his sober companion website:

Paris Cronin of sober soldiers

"Paris was born in Los Angeles, California and is the son of famed REO Speedwagon lead singer Kevin Cronin. Being raised on the road and exposed to the Rock N’ Roll lifestyle at an early age contributed to his struggle with drug addiction and alcoholism. At the age of 29 Paris grew tired of the way his life was going and finally decided to take control of his future and get sober. Paris began traveling all over the world working with touring bands as a Sober Companion."

The difference between paris cronin is that he is an addict of drugs and alcohol, that need to constantly be drug tested and watched for relapses of his own. (using the teachings of alcoholics anonymous: once you are an alcoholic or drug addict, you are always a drug addict and always a alcoholic)

dr. rob tencer of dr-sober-companion, also grew up in the household of a famous rock n roll group that toured the world, and also had excessive amounts of drugs and alcohol around him, except his family would not allow him to be in the same room when this excessive behavior was going on, and would not allow anyone around him to even swear or cuss around him.

Kevin Cronin failed his son and made him into the drug addict alcoholic that he is today.

dr-sober-companion is different.
dr. sober companion is made up of licensed doctors who were never drug addicts or alcoholics. Peer pressure or for whatever the reason in life, they were not cursed with the problems of addiction and don't need the supervision that all other sober companions require.

The worst fear that the families of my patients have, is that the enablers can get into the lives of their children. At sober soldiers They are letting addicts into the lives of their clients.

The list of addicts with experience as an alcoholic and drug user are endless.

* Is that the kind of 24 hour 7 day a week supervision you want for your son?
* Is that the kind of 24 hour 7 day a week supervision you want for your daughter?
* Is that the kind of 24 hour 7 day a week supervision you want for your loved one?
* Is that the kind of 24 hour 7 day a week supervision you want for your client?


dr. sober companion is unlike the rest, we aren't addicts now and never were.
dr. sober companion is different. dr. sober companion is not an alcoholic and was never an alcoholic.


dr. sober companion starts by removing enablers from your life, including addicts that now call themselves sober companions.

contact dr. sober companion here: dr.sober@gmail.com

Thursday, October 2, 2008

Why is Shia LaBeouf driving and why celebrities keep getting DUI after DUI

Shia LeBeouf - alcoholic - addict - arrested for DUI, again and again and again...


Have another drink Shia LeBeouf. What me worry about DUI? I'm famous!

Why is Shia LaBeouf driving? Why is Shia LaBeouf driving drunk? Why is Shia LaBeouf driving drunk and getting multiple DUI arrests? How can this be that he has not been locked up? Why hasn't Shia LeBeouf calling dr. sober companion

Yes its true that lawyers can do magic when they are paid to do their job expertly at getting socialites and celebrities and people with a lot of money, off the hook with jail time.


What happens if you choose the wrong lawyer? Can you fathom your son or daughter actually doing jail time? Wouldn't a better gaurantee be to hire dr. sober companion and prevent your kids from driving under the influence of drugs, alcohol or both?



Wouldn't it be better money spent on dr. sober companion life insurance policy then paying large sums of money to defend your children in court when they knowingly have done something wrong and were caught?

Shia LaBeouf's own father gave the curse of alcoholism and drug addictions to his son, himself has been battling alcoholism and drug addiction for years.

Have another drink Shia LeBeouf. What me worry about DUI? I'm famous!

Shia LaBeouf,was predictably arrested early Sunday morning on suspicion of DUI. It was only a matter of time, that he would have another DUI.

While making a left turn, Shia LaBeouf hit another car, and his truck rolled over. According to the police, “It was immediately apparent to officers responding on the scene that Shia LaBeouf was intoxicated and he was subsequently placed under arrest.”

Shia LaBeouf was treated at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center for injuries he sustained to his head, left hand and knee. Although his passenger and the driver of the other car also were hurt, the injuries (thankfully) were not serious. The actor was booked for a misdemeanor DUI and released.

If Shia LaBeouf pleads guilty to the DUI, a typical punishment generally includes: (1) three years of probation; (2) DUI classes; (3) driver’s license suspension; (4) monetary fines; and (5) mandatory attendance at a morgue or MADD class.


Have another drink Shia LeBeouf. What me worry about DUI? I'm famous!

Shia LaBeouf will fight tooth and nail to keep his driver's license, and his lawyer now has a plan.

We've learned today's DMV hearing to yank Shia LaBeouf's license has been postponed. Under California law, anyone in an accident who refuses to submit to a blood alcohol test generally has their license yanked automatically.

Shia LaBeouf's lawyer, Michael Norris, tells us he believes he can convince the DMV that when Shia LaBeouf was asked to submit to the test, he was in no position to respond. Norris says, "Asking someone to provide a blood or breath test while they're being prepared for surgery on a gurney is a very unusual situation."

Norris says Shia LaBeouf wasn't asked to submit to the test until he was already at the hospital for several hours.

Norris tells us he's asking the Sheriff's Department to turn over all videos they have of Shia LaBeouf that night, including a video of the intersection that presumably captured the entire scene. Norris says he wants to see if Shia LaBeouf was "legally arrested." Its still high time to call dr. sober companion to rescue the boy from further harm to himself and the strangers he gets into accidents with.


Could this be the future for drug addicted alcoholic Shia LeBeouf?

Major corporation benefits to include better sober companion life insurance policy.


Wouldn't it be great if corporations included benefits for sober companions? You might consider these health care benefits, but they should go under life insurance policies. Of course it would only be available to top tier employee's or the most valuable, because the costs of dr sober-companion life insurance would be to costly.

With corporations overworking its employee's with 100's of hours of overtime, its no wonder they turn to drugs and other substances that turn into addictions. Major corporations have to expect their employee's are getting help from drugs. Wouldn't it be great if they finally do something about the addictions they caused and the lives they ruined or ended?

It would also be fantastic if corporate benefits included dr sober-companion life insurance.
Because a life is worth saving from drug and alcohol addiction.

Olsen twins to hire another sober companion for life insurance




The olsen twins might try to purchase life insurance in the form of a sober companion. The primary goal of dr. sober companion is to save lives. This is a form of life insurance to anyone who has purchased our services. The olsen twins need a new life insurance policy after it was found that Olsen Twin, Mary-kate olsen in fear for her life after seeing her close drug buddy
heath ledger die from a drug overdose. How much is this type of protection worth to the olsen twins?




The kind of protection and life insurance she wants is a sober
companion like dr. Sober-companion. 24 hour 7 days a week protection
against drug and alcohol use. This life insurance is worth the
premium.

MARY-KATE OLSEN has been subpoenaed to testify in front of a Grand Jury as investigators hope to end the mystery surrounding HEATH LEDGER's drug overdose death.
Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) officials in New York are calling on Olsen, Ledger's close friend, to fill in the blanks related to the six-month-long investigation, according to U.S. news show Access Hollywood.
The latest news comes a day after her lawyer claimed the actress has provided law officials with all the information she knows about Ledger's accidental drug overdose in January (08).
The 22-year-old actress' testimony is sought after because the masseuse who found Ledger dead called Olsen before contacting the emergency services.
Reports on Monday (04Aug08) suggested Olsen was refusing to co-operate with the federal probe until she was guaranteed immunity from prosecution.
But her lawyer Michael C. Miller insisted, "We don't know the source of the information being quoted in the media regarding the Government's inquiry, but these descriptions are incomplete and inaccurate."
A timeline for Olsen's testimony has not been released.

MARY-KATE OLSEN knows nothing about the drugs which killed her friend HEATH LEDGER, her lawyer insists
Reports on Monday (04Aug08) suggested officials behind a federal probe into Ledger's January (08) death from an accidental overdose were targetting Olsen - but she was refusing to co-operate until she was guaranteed immunity from prosecution.
Her name was dragged into the case because the masseuse who found Ledger dead called Olsen before contacting the emergency services, prompting suspicions.
The 22-year-old actress' lawyer Michael C. Miller now tells Usmagazine.com that Olsen has provided the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) with all the information she has on her late pal.
Miller says, "Regarding the Government's investigation, at Ms. Olsen's request, we have provided the Government with relevant information including facts in the chronology of events surrounding Mr. Ledger's death and the fact that Ms. Olsen does not know the source of the drugs Mr. Ledger consumed."
Miller also blasted reports that Olsen faces a Grand Jury subpoena if she refuses to co-operate, adding, "We don't know the source of the information being quoted in the media regarding the Government's inquiry, but these descriptions are incomplete and inaccurate."

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

What is the difference in all the sober companions sober coaches sober escorts personal recovery assistants?

The difference between the different forms of sober coach, sober companion, sober escort, sober driver and personal recovery assistant and whatever else people are calling themselves is that they were and are all addicts of drugs and alcohol or both, that need to constantly be drug tested and watched for relapses of their own.

dr-sober-companion is different. dr. sober companion is made up of licensed doctors who were never drug addicts or alcoholics. Peer pressure or for whatever the reason in life, they were not cursed with the problems of addiction and don't need the supervision that all other sober companions require.

The following is actual experts from sober companion websites:


Hired Power Inc. requires their personal recovery assistants (sober companions) to have a minimal 5 years continuous sobriety, and be subject to random drug testing. Their constant supervision by a certified drug & alcohol counselor seems like it could be to monitor the personal recovery assistant as much as they monitor their clients.

The worst fear that the families of my patients have is that the enablers can get into the lives of their children. At Hired Power Inc. They are letting addicts into the lives of their clients.

These addicts or personal recovery assistants also must undergo extensive personal/professional /criminal/sex offender background checks.


Sober Champion also describes their staff as addicts who are trying to abstain from their addictions.

San Francisco native and recovering addict Douglas Caine, has many years of experience in recovery.

Pollyanne Hornbeck has been in recovery since 1999, and has provided many years of firm and loving service to women seeking relief from their addictions.

Dr. Bradley Fazekas has been in recovery since 1987.

Chicago native Stacy Matulis, in recovery from binge eating and anorexia, is an ideal resource for men and women seeking treatments for their obsessive/compulsive behaviors. Stacey credits her practice and teaching of Kundalini, Anusara, and Ashtanga Yoga with her recovery from binge eating and anorexia.



Sober Escorts Inc. describes themselves as addicts who have been there. "We are also very familiar with the fear and uncertainty associated with the decision to admit oneself to alcohol and/or drug treatment. We’ve been there."


New York Sober Champions staff includes addicts John Reidy A Queens N. Y. native, John has been in recovery from alcoholism and drug addiction since 1982. After spending much time homeless, jobless or incarcerated, he began attending meetings of several 12-Step fellowships in the York City area.

Martiza Exarchos, another addict with New York Sober Champions
is an actress & model, originally from the hills of Northern California. Her introduction to drugs came in her early teens at a cast party after a successful theatrical run. Slowly but surely, the drugs took over and she dropped out of the theater. Shady parts of San Francisco became her familiar territory... She lost good friends, continually disappointed her family, and made her relationship to drugs more important than any other. A number of years ago, on assignment in Greece, Maritza hit her last bottom. She found recovery and has been an ardent supporter of other women - especially adolescents - ever since..

The list of addicts with experience as an alcoholic and drug user are endless.

  • Is that the kind of 24 hour 7 day a week supervision you want for your son?
  • Is that the kind of 24 hour 7 day a week supervision you want for your daughter?
  • Is that the kind of 24 hour 7 day a week supervision you want for your loved one?
  • Is that the kind of 24 hour 7 day a week supervision you want for your client?

dr. sober companion is unlike the rest, we aren't addicts now and never were.
dr. sober companion is different. dr. sober companion is not an alcoholic and was never an alcoholic.


dr. sober
companion starts by removing enablers from your life, including addicts that now call themselves sober companions.

contact dr. sober companion here: dr.sober@gmail.com

5 reasons why parents need dr sober companion for their daughter

BAD INFLUENCES

Your daughter is the love of your life. She wanted her freedom to go to school but she picked up very bad habits while she was away and out of your supervision. She started drinking and taking drugs. It started with happy hour, but became any hour of the day or night.

PEER PRESSURE
If your daughter has a problem with drinking or drugs, and gets to carried away, to quickly, should she even be going out with a bunch of lushes? Your daughter has no willpower to make these decisions on her own, and peer pressure puts her in a bad position.

OUT OF CONTROL
Making a fool out of herself when she is drunk or high on drugs, is something she will regret for the rest of her life. The embarrassment to her family, who has to see the photo's in the newspapers and magazines could have been prevented with dr sober companion.


BLACKOUTS

A very good reason parents need dr sober companion for their daughters, is that once the girl gets high or drunk or even worse, she blacks out. She doesn't know what kind of trouble she is getting into, and has no way of stopping it. She doesn't know who she is with or how she got there. She is in for a big surprise when she wakes up.


STRANGERS LEAD HER ASTRAY
The last reason your daughters need a sober companion is the large risk of what kind of people are your drugged out or drunk daughters ending up with for the night? They can't possibly make the right decisions and they guy she is with is making the decision for her.

The final choice to act now is yours. Do you want to see your daughter in the worst case scenario or do you want to have many more years with your daughter the way she was before the bad influences and enablers impact on her life?

WORST CASE SCENARIO

HAPPY DAYS WITH YOUR DAUGHTERS

Sunday, September 28, 2008

How much does dr. sober companion cost?

How much does dr. sober companion cost?

*** New Price: $900 per day, plus any expenses incurred.***

As part of our own version of the Obama Stimulus Package, we have decided to lower the fee per day to $900 instead of the $1,000 we previously charged. The total amount for the month continues to be payable at the beginning of the month and cannot be pro rated if you decide to quit.

24/7 supervision does not come cheaply, so if you can't afford a licensed doctor on live call 24 hours a day and seven days a week, maybe you should take a leave of absence of your life's work and do it yourself, instead of enabling your children.

How can you place a price on the final achievement desired of keeping our patients clean and sober? In a closed environment like a rehab center this is easier to accomplish, but what happens when the patient leaves the rehab center or what happens when they finally get out of jail from the dui?

How can you put a price on keeping someone out of a cemetery?

We charge $1,ooo / day plus any expenses incurred.

With at least a full payment for the month in advance, or payment for the year to lock in our dedication to your son, daughter or loved one or client. No refunds and No pro rating of time used, will be given for any purpose. Working on you, means we cannot and will not accept other clients during our time which has been paid for.

What exactly does dr. sober companion do?

What exactly does dr. sober companion do?

WE SAVE LIVES!

dr. sober companion really does save lives by preventing addicts who want to quit from their life of addiction. The addicts cycle of prolonged use of drugs and alcohol is prevented from happening again. dr. sober stops the cycle from returning to their patients life.

WE BREAK THE CYCLE!


dr. sober companion breaks the cycle through a number of ways such as:

  • 24/7 Supervision by dr. sober companion
  • Removing the enablers
  • Taking the only set of keys to the car, out of the hands of the addict

who is dr. sober companion?

Who is dr. sober companion?

Dr. sober companion was developed by dr. rob tencer dc, bsc whom besides being a licensed doctor of chiropractic, has specialized in damage control publicity. By watching over his clients in the socialite pr and celebrity pr world, dr. tencer learned the skills necessary to protect his clients, not only from the press, but from themselves.

dr. rob tencer also developed a drug and alcohol free zone by only surrounding himself with people trying to quit their addictions, and helping them by removing the enablers in their lives.

dr. rob tencer developed dr. sober companion as a drug free zone, where the patients would not be around their enablers, which would have made it impossible for them to quit.

dr. sober companion is a team of sober companions, sober escorts, sober coaches, sober drivers, medical doctors and doctors of chiropractic and even rehab centers.

In summary, we are highly skilled at watching over your most important people in your life, and can help not only extend their lives, but save their lives.

Dr. Sober Companion is hiring: Sober Companion Jobs

While dr. sober companion Rob Tencer DC, Bsc is only one man, and unable to help more than 1 addict at a time, he is hiring sober companions who have a similar ideology, philosophy, and similar treatment plan for helping addicts. If interested: Please send your photo and a resume to email dr. sober companion.

21 ways dr. sober companion can help you fight addiction

Do you want success for your addiction to drugs and alcohol? What follows is a list of help from dr. sober companion .

You are the most important person, and you are worth saving you from yourself. A sober companion like Dr. Rob Tencer can help you.

You are your own worst enemy and you are tour worst nightmare, but it does not have to be like that. Read on to learn what a dr. sober companion like Dr. Rob Tencer can do for you.

"But if I only had someone there to stop me from the first hit, shot, drink, snort, than I could have stopped myself."

You can always hide it from your dr. sober companion, but sooner than later, your dr. sober companion will know and he will have the power to do something about it, before it gets out of hand.

Here is a list of articles I have written for your protection, on my many websites and blogs.

I am here to help you, and I want you to never forget it!

Advice / Wisdom / Situations that could have been prevented

1. dr. sober companion is not your buddy, but I will always be there for you.

2. How to deal with fame, and surround yourself with good people like dr. sober companion.

3.
Doctor sober companion can tell the difference from a malingering patient and abuser.

4.
dr. sober companion could have saved Chris Benoit's life.

5.
An important word about peer pressure and handlers from dr. sober companion.

6.
How to stop yourself from getting a tattoo by dr. sober companion.

7.
Someone to keep you looking good and happy by dr. sober companion.

8.
Stopping leaked photos by not drinking or using drugs by dr sober companion.

9.
No need to write apology letters to fans if you don't screw up. by dr. sober companion

10.
Controlling bad press starts before you leave the house. by dr. sober companion

11.
Controlling leaks in confidentiality (extensive info) by dr. sober companion

12.
Your reputation starts with the company you keep and getting a driver. by dr. sober companion

13.
What good is fame and beauty when you die young? by dr. sober companion

14.
Fame can come at an early age. Are you prepared? by dr. sober companion

15.
Class and reputation is easy to lose if your name is Paris Hilton. by dr. sober companion

16.
If I have a sober companion, do I need an assistant and a bodyguard?

17.
What if I mistreat or disrespect my Sober Companion.

18.
Protecting your reputation on Myspace and Facebook. by dr. sober companion

19.
Radio interview of dr. sober companion

20.
Building your team starts with a driver 24/7. by dr. sober companion

21.
Teens need a good team. by dr. sober companion


Some last words of advice to end this post are: "Always remember that I can be your Sober Companion, and that there is a sober companion out there that can help you."

Dr. Rob Tencer DC BSc - dr. Sober Companion
call me at: 248-808-2270
dr.sober@gmail.com